While it’s a good way to conserve time and money, it totally ruined the ambiance of the story. The director deleted parts of the story and replaced them with more simplistic concepts. The adaptation of ”All Summer in a Day” is not effective like that.
If deletion of scenes is the case, it’s important to put in scenes that’ll keep the same feeling/emotion. Also, we as humans like to relate with people so if we can feel the same joy, or guilt, or sadness as the characters in the film, it makes it more pleasurable. This is because if you didn’t show any emotion or feeling towards a movie, it’s automatically categorized as boring. A movie is always more enjoyable if it makes you feel some type of way. Also cutting/adding things can destroy the feelings resented by the viewer. But if the director completely altered the story’s dialogue and deleted some scenes, the film becomes a director’s own creation with hints of plagiarism and not a film adaptation. It’s just a way to personalize the movie to the director’s liking. There would be direct phrases from the story that you’d hear in the film or some lines that won’t appear at all. It’s the script, the words said in the story. Language elements is a key part in a movie.
0 kommentar(er)
